STANDARDS

Common Core: RH.6-8.1, RH.6-8.2, RH.6-8.4, RH.6-8.7, RH.6-8.9, WHST.6-8.4, WHST.6-8.9, RI.6-8.1, RI.6-8.2, RI.6-8.4, RI.6-8.7, RI.6-8.9, W.6-8.4, W.6-8.9, SL.6-8.1

NCSS: Time, Continuity, and Change • Individual Development and Identity • Individuals, Groups, and Institutions • Power, Authority, and Governance • Civic Ideals and Practices

Illustration by John Jay Cabuay

FLASHBACK

The Fight to Go to School

Seventy-five years ago, Sylvia Mendez became a key figure in a battle for equal education for Mexican American students. Her community’s victory would pave the way for the end of racially segregated schools across the country.

As You Read, Think About: How did discrimination affect Sylvia Mendez? How did her community fight for changes?

Sylvia Mendez could not have been happier. It was September 1944, and the 8-year-old was about to register for third grade at a new school in Westminster, California. 

Just a few months before, Sylvia, her parents, and her younger brothers had moved to the town to run a local farm. Now her Aunt Soledad, who also lived on the farm with her husband and daughters, was taking all the kids to the Westminster Main School for the first time.

Sylvia Mendez could not have been happier. It was September 1944. The 8-year-old was about to register for third grade at a new school in Westminster, California.

Just a few months before, Sylvia, her parents, and her younger brothers had moved to the town to run a local farm. Her Aunt Soledad also lived on the farm with her husband and daughters. Now Aunt Soledad was taking all the kids to the Westminster Main School for the first time.

Courtesy Mendez Family

Felicitas and Gonzalo Mendez were determined to fight for equality for their kids. Inset: Gonzalo on the farm.

“My mother had bought us all new clothes. We were so excited to go to school,” Mendez recalls today. The children never expected their visit to help set in motion a series of events that would change education in America forever. 

The official they met said the school would accept Aunt Soledad’s daughters, who were light skinned. But Sylvia and her brothers, who had dark skin, hair, and eyes, would have to go to the town’s “Mexican school” a few blocks away.

Furious, Aunt Soledad marched the kids home, refusing to enroll any of them. Sylvia’s parents, Gonzalo and Felicitas, were also outraged. They were hardworking American citizens. The Mendezes were determined to fight back—and would eventually join with other families to do so in court.

Their lawsuit, Mendez v. Westminster School District, would ultimately lead to the end of school segregation in California. It would also help pave the way for an even bigger victory: the outlawing of segregation in public schools throughout the United States.

“My mother had bought us all new clothes. We were so excited to go to school,” Mendez recalls today. The children never expected their visit to help set in motion a series of events that would change education in America forever.

The official they met said the school would accept Aunt Soledad’s daughters, who were light skinned. But Sylvia and her brothers had dark skin, hair, and eyes. They would have to go to the town’s “Mexican school” a few blocks away.

Furious, Aunt Soledad marched the kids home. She refused to enroll any of them. Sylvia’s parents, Gonzalo and Felicitas, were also outraged. They were hardworking American citizens. The Mendezes were determined to fight back. And they would eventually join with other families to do so in court.

Their lawsuit was Mendez v. Westminster School District. It would ultimately lead to the end of school segregation in California. It also would help pave the way for an even bigger victory: the outlawing of segregation in public schools throughout the United States.

Facing Discrimination

Russell Lee Photograph Collection, e_rl_14646_0038, The Dolph Briscoe Center for American History, The University of Texas at Austin

Signs like this one were once common throughout the Southwest.

In the 1940s, Orange County, California, where the Mendez family lived, was one of the nation’s top producers of fruits and vegetables. Most of the workers picking that produce were Mexican American citizens or migrants from Mexico. The work was hard and paid poorly. But few other jobs were open to people of Mexican heritage then. 

In fact, in much of the country, particularly the Southwest, they faced constant discrimination. They were prevented from living in areas with sewers or paved streets. Stores and restaurants posted signs such as “No dogs or Mexicans” to keep them out. And Mexican American kids were forced to attend inferior schools, separate from their White peers. 

Sylvia saw the differences firsthand. Every day, the school bus would drop her and her brothers off in front of the Westminster Main School. The big, clean building had a beautifully kept grass yard, palm trees in front, and a playground with swings, a seesaw, and more.

But Sylvia and her brothers had to walk right past it—down the street to Hoover Elementary. The overcrowded school for Mexican American students was little more than a couple of wooden shacks. At recess, students played on a dirt lot, swatting away flies from the cow pasture next door. Worse, Sylvia knew that the education students received there was poor.

 “The schoolbooks were all handed down, so they’d be torn,” she says. Rather than being taught subjects like science and math, the children were trained to become farmhands and maids. The White officials who oversaw Hoover Elementary expected the school’s students to grow up to provide cheap labor. 

But people like the Mendezes envisioned a different future for their kids. Change was coming.

The Mendez family lived in Orange County, California. In the 1940s, that region was one of the nation’s top producers of fruits and vegetables. Most of the workers picking that produce were Mexican American citizens or migrants from Mexico. The work was hard. It paid poorly. But few other jobs were open to people of Mexican heritage then.

In fact, they faced constant discrimination in much of the country. That was particularly true in the Southwest. They were prevented from living in areas with sewers or paved streets. Stores and restaurants posted signs such as “No dogs or Mexicans” to keep them out. And Mexican American kids were forced to attend inferior schools, separate from their White peers.

Sylvia saw the differences firsthand. Every day, the school bus would drop her and her brothers off in front of the Westminster Main School. The big, clean building had a beautifully kept grass yard and palm trees in front. It had a playground with swings, a seesaw, and more.

But Sylvia and her brothers had to walk right past it. They went down the street to Hoover Elementary. The overcrowded school for Mexican American students was little more than a couple of wooden shacks. At recess, students played on a dirt lot. They swatted away flies from the cow pasture next door. Worse, Sylvia knew that students received a poor education there.

“The schoolbooks were all handed down, so they’d be torn,” she says. The children were not taught subjects like science and math. Instead, they were trained to become farmhands and maids. The White officials who oversaw Hoover Elementary expected the school’s students to grow up to provide cheap labor.

But people like the Mendezes saw a different future for their kids. Change was coming.

Building a Lawsuit

By the mid 1940s, Mexican Americans were already fighting for equal rights throughout the Southwest. Groups of parents in Texas, Arizona, and California had successfully sued their school districts, forcing them to integrate. Still, school segregation was practiced almost everywhere else.

Many Mexican American families were determined to right that wrong, however. In Orange County, where Sylvia lived, parents and community groups were already appearing before school boards to demand integration. But they were largely getting nowhere.

By the mid 1940s, Mexican Americans were already fighting for equal rights throughout the Southwest. Groups of parents in Texas, Arizona, and California had successfully sued their school districts. They had forced the districts to integrate. Still, school segregation was practiced almost everywhere else.

Many Mexican American families were determined to right that wrong. In Orange County, where Sylvia lived, parents and community groups were already appearing before school boards to demand integration. But they were largely getting nowhere.

In the end, five families joined the lawsuit to challenge school segregation.

Finally, a group that Sylvia’s father was part of hired a lawyer to challenge school segregation in court. The lawyer, David Marcus, had represented other Mexican American clients before. To win, he said, several families should join together in a class-action lawsuit.

Sylvia’s father was one of several community members who drove around Orange County with Marcus, looking for families to sign on. Meanwhile, Sylvia’s mother took over running the farm and helped get parents to sign a petition against their school board.

In the end, five families from four Orange County school districts came together for the lawsuit. In March 1945, it was filed on behalf of the families as Mendez v. Westminster School District. The plaintiffs in the suit argued that forcing their children to attend separate schools denied them equal protection under the law—a right guaranteed by the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. 

Finally, a group that Sylvia’s father was part of hired a lawyer named David Marcus to challenge school segregation in court. Marcus had represented other Mexican American clients before. He said that to win, several families should join together in a class-action lawsuit.

Sylvia’s father and other community members drove around Orange County with Marcus. They were looking for families to sign on. Meanwhile, Sylvia’s mother took over running the farm. And she helped get parents to sign a petition against their school board.

In the end, five families from four Orange County school districts came together for the lawsuit. In March 1945, it was filed on behalf of the families as Mendez v. Westminster School District. The plaintiffs in the suit argued that forcing their children to attend separate schools denied them equal protection under the law. That was a right guaranteed by the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Illustration by John Jay Cabuay

Under questioning by lawyer David Marcus (left), Felicitas Mendez stood up for her rights as an American.

Proving Discrimination

The trial began on July 5. Marcus called the parents to the witness stand to explain how they had tried to enroll their children in their neighborhood schools but had been denied. For their part, school officials claimed that the Mexican American students had been placed in separate schools because they didn’t speak English well and would have held back the other learners. But Marcus called two students to the stand to prove that claim false. Not only did they, like many of their classmates, speak English fluently, officials had never even tested them.

All in all, members of 13 different families testified about the discrimination they had faced. When Sylvia’s mother, Felicitas, took the stand, she explained: “We always tell our children they are Americans. They shouldn’t be segregated.” 

Through skillful questioning, Marcus got school officials to show that they believed people of Mexican heritage were inferior to White people. One superintendent admitted that he thought Mexicans were far less intelligent and that they should be segregated in society. 

Importantly, Marcus also called experts to the stand to show that separating children based on their ethnicity was damaging to them. “Segregation, by its very nature, is a constant reminder of inferiority, of not being wanted,” one longtime educator said in her testimony.

The trial began on July 5. Marcus called the parents to the witness stand. They explained how they had tried to enroll their children in their neighborhood schools but had been denied. For their part, school officials claimed that the Mexican American students had been placed in separate schools because they did not speak English well. They said the students would have held back the other learners. But Marcus called two students to the stand to prove that claim false. Like many of their classmates, they spoke English fluently. The officials had never even tested them.

All in all, members of 13 different families testified about the discrimination they had faced. Sylvia’s mother, Felicitas, took the stand. She explained: “We always tell our children they are Americans. They shouldn’t be segregated.”

Through skillful questioning, Marcus got school officials to show that they believed people of Mexican heritage were inferior to White people. One superintendent admitted that he thought Mexicans were far less intelligent. He thought they should be segregated in society.

Importantly, Marcus also called experts to the stand to show that separating children based on their ethnicity was damaging to them. “Segregation, by its very nature, is a constant reminder of inferiority, of not being wanted,” one longtime educator said in her testimony.

The Judge’s Decision

On February 18, 1946, the judge who had heard the case issued a decision: By segregating Mexican American children, he said, the school districts had violated the students’ 14th Amendment rights to “equal protection of the law.” The meaning of the judge’s words was clear: Separate schools can never be equal schools.

But the fight wasn’t over. The Orange County schools appealed the judge’s decision to a higher court. In April 1947, that court upheld the Mendez victory. The case prompted California Governor Earl Warren to sign a bill banning racial segregation in California schools just two months later. 

From there, the case would trigger bolder demands for racial equality, says historian David-James Gonzales of Brigham Young University in Utah. He is an expert on the Mexican American struggle for civil rights. “The whole legal basis for segregating people by race was undermined by Mendez,” he explains. Crucially, the case helped pave the way for the landmark case Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka—and the 1954 ruling on it by the U.S. Supreme Court—which banned segregation in all American schools (see sidebar, below).

On February 18, 1946, the judge who had heard the case issued a decision. He said that by segregating Mexican American children, the school districts had violated the students’ 14th Amendment rights to “equal protection of the law.” The meaning of the judge’s words was clear. Separate schools can never be equal schools.

But the fight was not over. The Orange County schools appealed the judge’s decision to a higher court. In April 1947, that court upheld the Mendez victory. The case prompted California Governor Earl Warren to sign a bill banning racial segregation in California schools just two months later.

From there, the case would trigger bolder demands for racial equality, says David-James Gonzales. He is a historian at Brigham Young University in Utah, and an expert on the Mexican American struggle for civil rights. “The whole legal basis for segregating people by race was undermined by Mendez,” he explains. Crucially, the case helped pave the way for the landmark case Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, and the 1954 ruling on it by the U.S. Supreme Court. The Brown ruling banned segregation in all American schools (see sidebar, below).

Bettmann Archive/Getty Images

A mother and daughter on the Supreme Court steps celebrating the Brown decision

Defeating “Separate but Equal”

In 1951, a Black man named Oliver Brown sued the school board of Topeka, Kansas. The reason: His daughter, Linda, had been denied entrance to their neighborhood school, which was all White.

In time, a dozen other Black families joined the lawsuit. The case, Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, eventually reached the U.S. Supreme Court.

The civil rights lawyers who headed the families’ legal team—including Thurgood Marshall, who later became the first Black Supreme Court justice—used arguments made in Mendez v. Westminster as a model. Separating Black students denied them their 14th Amendment rights, the lawyers argued. 

In 1954, the justices of the Supreme Court ruled 9-0 for the families. The practice of “separate but equal” was unlawful, the Court’s opinion said. “Segregated schools are inherently unequal.”

In the end, that Supreme Court decision made racial segregation in schools illegal throughout the U.S.

In 1951, a Black man named Oliver Brown sued the school board of Topeka, Kansas. The reason: His daughter, Linda, had been denied entrance to their neighborhood school, which was all White.

In time, a dozen other Black families joined the lawsuit. The case, Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, eventually reached the U.S. Supreme Court.

The civil rights lawyers who headed the families’ legal team—including Thurgood Marshall, who later became the first Black Supreme Court justice—used arguments made in Mendez v. Westminster as a model. Separating Black students denied them their 14th Amendment rights, the lawyers argued. 

In 1954, the justices of the Supreme Court ruled 9-0 for the families. The practice of “separate but equal” was unlawful, the Court’s opinion said. “Segregated schools are inherently unequal.”

In the end, that Supreme Court decision made racial segregation in schools illegal throughout the U.S.

What They Fought For

Larry Downing/Reuters

In 2011, Sylvia Mendez received the Presidential Medal of Freedom from President Barack Obama.

After the ruling, Sylvia and her brothers were finally able to enroll in the Westminster Main School. The coursework was more rigorous there, and Sylvia enjoyed learning alongside classmates of all races, many of whom became her friends. She rose to the challenges her lessons presented—then pushed on through high school and college, and had a long career as a registered nurse.

Now 85 years old, in recent years Sylvia has dedicated herself to sharing what her community accomplished some 75 years ago. As she travels the country speaking to students about the legacy of the Mendez case, she has one central message: Education is critical. 

“The American dream is possible, no matter the color of your skin or where you come from,” she says. “But you have to work hard.” And like her parents and the many Mexican American families who fought for equality, “you must persevere.” 

After the ruling, Sylvia and her brothers were finally able to enroll in the Westminster Main School. The coursework was more rigorous there. And Sylvia enjoyed learning alongside classmates of all races. Many of them became her friends. She rose to the challenges her lessons presented. Then she pushed on through high school and college. She had a long career as a registered nurse.

Mendez is now 85 years old. In recent years, she has dedicated herself to sharing what her community accomplished some 75 years ago. She travels the country speaking to students about the legacy of the Mendez case. She has one central message: Education is critical.

“The American dream is possible, no matter the color of your skin or where you come from,” she says. “But you have to work hard.” And like her parents and the many Mexican American families who fought for equality, “you must persevere.”

SKILL SPOTLIGHT

Analyzing a Primary Source

Decades after Mendez v. Westminster School District was decided, Sylvia Mendez continues to tell Americans about its importance. Yet even after that victory, real change came slowly. As Mendez explains in a recent interview, she herself didn’t understand the full significance of the case at the time. Read this excerpt from the interview, then answer the questions.

As a 9-year-old girl, all I was thinking when we went to court was that [my parents] were fighting for me to go to this beautiful school [the Westminster Main School], never realizing exactly what they were fighting for. 

[The ruling on the case] had a ripple effect all over Southern California. The theaters were eventually integrated* and [finding] housing became easier [for people of Mexican heritage].

[But] I’ll never forget the first day I walked into school and this little boy comes up to me and he says, “You’re a Mexican! What are you Mexicans doing here? Don’t you know that Mexicans don’t belong in this school?”

When that boy said that to me, I felt this pain in my heart like somebody had stabbed me. I felt so hurt, so humiliated, that I started crying. And I went home and I told my mother, “Mother, I don’t want to be in that school. They don’t want us there. They don’t want Mexicans there.”

And my mother said to me, “Sylvia, weren’t you aware of what we were fighting for all this time? You were there in court every day! Don’t you know exactly what we wanted for you? We wanted for you to know that you are just as equal as that boy. That’s what we were fighting for you, for you not to feel humiliated, for you not to feel inferior, because . . . you’re just as good as he is.” 

*Throughout California and the Southwest, people of Mexican heritage had been banned from movie theaters or forced to sit in the balcony.


1. How did the encounter with the boy in school make Sylvia feel? Cite details from the interview.

2. What lesson did Sylvia’s mother want her to learn?

3. What does the author mean by “real change came slowly”? Cite details from the article and the interview.

4. How does the Court’s decision continue to affect young people today?

As a 9-year-old girl, all I was thinking when we went to court was that [my parents] were fighting for me to go to this beautiful school [the Westminster Main School], never realizing exactly what they were fighting for. 

[The ruling on the case] had a ripple effect all over Southern California. The theaters were eventually integrated* and [finding] housing became easier [for people of Mexican heritage].

[But] I’ll never forget the first day I walked into school and this little boy comes up to me and he says, “You’re a Mexican! What are you Mexicans doing here? Don’t you know that Mexicans don’t belong in this school?”

When that boy said that to me, I felt this pain in my heart like somebody had stabbed me. I felt so hurt, so humiliated, that I started crying. And I went home and I told my mother, “Mother, I don’t want to be in that school. They don’t want us there. They don’t want Mexicans there.”

And my mother said to me, “Sylvia, weren’t you aware of what we were fighting for all this time? You were there in court every day! Don’t you know exactly what we wanted for you? We wanted for you to know that you are just as equal as that boy. That’s what we were fighting for you, for you not to feel humiliated, for you not to feel inferior, because . . . you’re just as good as he is.” 

*Throughout California and the Southwest, people of Mexican heritage had been banned from movie theaters or forced to sit in the balcony.


1. How did the encounter with the boy in school make Sylvia feel? Cite details from the interview.

2. What lesson did Sylvia’s mother want her to learn?

3. What does the author mean by “real change came slowly”? Cite details from the article and the interview.

4. How does the Court’s decision continue to affect young people today?

Interactive Quiz for this article

Click the Google Classroom button below to share the Know the News quiz with your class.

Download .PDF
Skills Sheets (6)
Skills Sheets (6)
Skills Sheets (6)
Skills Sheets (6)
Skills Sheets (6)
Skills Sheets (6)
Lesson Plan (2)
Lesson Plan (2)
Leveled Articles (1)
Text-to-Speech